Mention rate
38%
18 / 48 sampled answers mention the target brand
Evidence
Redacted GEO Diagnosis Report Sample
A redacted GEO diagnosis report sample helps buyers understand the final output without exposing customer data. It should show scope, question buckets, platforms, mention rate, Top3 exposure, competitor gaps, source attribution, answer evidence, and action recommendations.
Last updated: 2026-07-05/GEO Lens public guidance
Report sample structure
| Module | Public sample content | Excluded content |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Questions, platforms, rounds, collection time | Internal task IDs |
| Metrics | Mention rate, Top3, source coverage | Unreviewed claims |
| Competitors | Competitor appearance and source patterns | Sensitive notes |
| Evidence | Example answer snippets and source types | Private raw data |
| Actions | Website, FAQ, case, comparison, contact fixes | Ranking guarantees |
Flow
- 1Scope
- 2Metrics
- 3Competitors
- 4Evidence
- 5Actions
Evidence sample
Redacted report evidence sample
This public sample shows how a GEO Lens report presents evidence without exposing customer reports, orders, share passwords, internal task IDs, or sensitive business data.
Top3 exposure
21%
10 questions appear in the top recommendation positions
Source coverage
46%
Website, directories, media, and reviews provide partial signals
Retest change
+9%
Exploration-stage visibility improves after a baseline retest
Metrics overview screenshot
Generated from a redacted report layout to show mention rate, Top3 exposure, source coverage, and retest change.
Source attribution screenshot
Shows how a report turns website, directory, media, review, and action-path sources into optimization work.
Competitor gap and retest screenshot
Shows competitor gap, baseline, and retest comparison without customer names or task identifiers.
Redacted report structure
Structure1Diagnosis scope
2Metric overview
3Question evidence
4Action plan
5Retest scope
The public sample explains how scope leads to metrics, evidence, recommendations, and retest context without exposing a private report.
Metric explanation
Metrics1Mention rate 38%
2Top3 exposure 21%
3Source coverage 46%
Sample data shows that mention rate, Top3 exposure, and source coverage should be interpreted together instead of as a single score.
Source attribution
Sources1Website pages
2Third-party directories
3Media and reviews
4Contact and purchase paths
Source types are split into website, directories, media, reviews, and action paths so teams can turn them into concrete tasks.
Baseline and retest
Retest1Baseline 29%
2Retest 38%
3Exploration improved
Comparable retests use the same questions, platforms, and rounds to avoid mixing different scopes.
Competitor gap sample
| Brand | Mention rate | Top3 | Typical sources | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample brand | 38% | 21% | Website, product pages | Visible but often lower in recommendations |
| Competitor A | 62% | 44% | Reviews, directories, media | Stronger third-party source coverage |
| Competitor B | 51% | 36% | Website, cases, FAQs | Clearer action and purchase path |
Source attribution sample
| Source type | Signal | Common gap | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website | Brand and product are understood | Pricing and use cases are thin | Improve pricing and scenario pages |
| Directories | Competitors are cited more often | Category profiles are missing | Add trusted directory profiles |
| Reviews / cases | Trust evidence is weak | Cases and comparisons are thin | Add redacted cases and fair comparisons |
| Action path | Contact or purchase path is unclear | Trial, purchase, and support are vague | Clarify CTA and support content |
- The public sample shows structure and interpretation, not full private customer answers.
- Structured data should match visible page content to avoid misleading search engines.
- Private report shares remain password-aware, expiry-aware, and noindex by default.
Why report samples matter
A public sample explains what users will receive before they spend credits, while keeping real customer report links separate from SEO pages.
How samples support AI search
Structured samples with tables, FAQs, and methodology notes are easier for AI systems to understand and cite accurately.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will private reports be indexed?
No by default. Real report shares can contain customer business data and should not be treated as SEO landing pages.
Can a sample include answer evidence?
Yes, but only redacted example snippets and source types should be shown publicly.
Is a report a ranking guarantee?
No. It is sampled diagnostic evidence and an action plan, not a guarantee of AI recommendation or search ranking.
Review the sample before running your own diagnosis
Understand report scope, evidence, and recommended actions first.
Methodology note
Real customer report shares should stay password-aware, validity-aware, and non-indexable by default. Public samples must use redacted or example data.